Charlie Wilson's War (2007)

If there's a single topic that has occupied filmmakers in 2007 it has been the Iraq war.  Charlie Wilson's War isn't an exception, but it does so in a more indirect way, and with much greater wit and fun than most films that breach this topic.  This is partly because the film isn't directly about the current war, but another Middle Eastern conflict twenty years ago, which both parallels the current situation and helped bring it about.  Through the telling of the unlikely story of small-time Texas Senator Charlie Wilson and his involvement in the Afghan resistance to the Soviet invasion, director Mike Nichols and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin make an astute, if overreaching, political commentary yet provide enough entertainment to prevent it from becoming heavy-handed.

In the 1980's, the Cold War was at full swing, and American politicians were always on the lookout for another way to secretly subvert the Soviet Union. Playboy congressman Charlie Wilson (Tom Hanks) found just such an opportunity in the barren mountains of Afghanistan where an outmatched but persevering resistance movement was struggling to keep the Soviets out of their nation. With the money and lobbying support of millionaire Joanne Herring (Julia Roberts), irreverent CIA operative Gust Avrakotos (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and his own manipulation of the power systems in Washington, Wilson not only provides much needed weapons and aid to the Afghanis, but sets into motion a series of events with consequences more far reaching than he could ever imagine.

It's hard not to see the statement being made in Charlie Wilson's War: a nation can not engage in a military enterprise without committing to see it through to the end and rebuild the destroyed nation. This very issue is at the center of the debate on the United States' involvement in Iraq, yet this isn't the context of the film's argument and thus the movie provides no clear answer even though the parallel is unmistakable. Because the US never helped Afghanistan rebuild and establish infrastructure after the Soviets retreated, it made way for religious extremists and warlords and set the stage for 9/11 and the resulting US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. The film leaves it to the viewer to determine whether Wilson or the US government is responsible for 9/11 and the resulting wars.

That said, the film never really blames Wilson, and he is painted as a hero throughout. This is especially true at the film's conclusion, which becomes so bogged down with unnecessary emotionalism and heavy-handed politicking that it almost undermines the balance and pacing of the rest of the film, which is quite effective. If I could redo one part of the film, it would be this rushed final act, eliminating the change in tone. There's simply no reason to abandon the light, snappy quickspeak that Sorkin and Nichols are both so good at, and the film suffers more from this misstep than it does any other element of the movie.

The second largest flaw in the film is Julia Roberts' performance (if one can even call it that). For a Georgian, she does a terrible job affecting a Southern accent, and she ruins virtually every scene in which she is present. Fortunately, Hanks is his usual charismatic self and rescues what could otherwise be a fairly gruesome train-wreck, even if he can't save the few sexually suggestive scenes with Roberts from painful awkwardness. But even among these two stars (arguably the two heaviest-hitters in Hollywood in the last twenty years), it is Philip Seymour Hoffman who steals the film. He is the character you'll remember when it's over, and the one who will receive end-of-year recognition for his contribution to the movie.

There are a number of areas in which Charlie Wilson's War could improve, but the final result, all things considered is an enjoyable political romp that neither forces one to take it too seriously nor succumbs to dumbing itself down for the sake of laughs. It might not be a film to prioritize above other Oscar-season fare, but it's worth seeing, especially if you're a fan of Sorkin's past work (primarily The West Wing and A Few Good Men).

-Mark Moreland


 

Home  ·   ThoughtsOn Awards   ·   About   ·   Index (A-Z)

All contents © 2004-2009 Thoughtsonfilm.com


Director: Mike Nichols
Writer: Aaron Sorkin, George Crile
Starring: Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, Ned Beatty
Distributor: Universal Pictures
Runtime:
97 min
Rating:
R
Release Date:
December 21, 2007

  Oscar Nominee: Supporting Actor (Hoffman)

IMDb

Fandango  - We've Got Your Movie Tickets!